MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4205108550 · doi:10.22215/etd/2021-14725

Nonlinear Interactions Between Atmospheric Rossby Waves and Internal Gravity Waves in a Baroclinic Fluid Flow

2021· dissertation· en· W4205108550 on OpenAlexaff
Abdulrahman Alzahrani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
FundersKing Saud University
KeywordsRossby waveBaroclinityGravity wavePhysicsRossby numberZonal flow (plasma)Rossby radius of deformationInternal waveAtmospheric waveMechanicsMean flowAmplitudeClassical mechanicsGeostrophic windGravitational waveGeophysicsAtmospheric sciencesAstrophysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this thesis, we use analytical and numerical methods to study a mathematical problem describing two types of waves in an atmospheric fluid flow, namely planetary Rossby waves resulting from the rotation of the earth and internal gravity waves resulting from the gravitational and buoyancy forces.We consider a three-dimensional or baroclinic configuration and make the quasi-geostrophic approximation in the spe-for giving me the opportunity to do the research and providing invaluable guidance throughout this research.Her encouragement, support, understanding, vision, sincerity and motivation have deeply inspired me.Prof. Campbell was always available when needed and always would give valuable advice.She has taught me the methodology to carry out the research and present it as clearly as possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics→French-language works237,207→