MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205112021 · doi:10.1097/nrl.0000000000000419

Posterior Circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (pc-ASPECT) for the Evaluation of Cerebellar Infarcts

2022· article· en· W4205112021 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Neurologist · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineComputed tomographyStroke (engine)Circulation (fluid dynamics)Ischemic strokeRadiologyCardiologyInternal medicineIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Patients with cerebellar ischemic stroke may be misdiagnosed and may exhibit a delayed time to acute stroke treatment compared with patients with anterior circulation ischemic stroke. The posterior circulation Alberta stroke program early computed tomography score (pc-ASPECT) score has been used to evaluate hyperacute stroke, much as the ASPECT in anterior circulation stroke recently. Our main objective was to evaluate the associations of the clinical and etiological characteristics of ischemic cerebellar infarction patients on admission with their pc-ASPECT scores, as well as the correlations of the pc-ASPECT score with morbidity and mortality rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We include 114 patients with cerebellar infarction who underwent 1 year of follow-up into the study. RESULTS: Patients with a pc-ASPECT score <7 were more likely to present with impaired consciousness ( P <0.001), multiple posterior circulation infarcts ( P <0.001), hydrocephalus ( P <0.001), lesions of the vermis ( P =0.028), and peduncle ( P =0.024), perfusion deficits in the total of posterior inferior cerebellar artery, anterior inferior cerebellar artery, superior cerebellar artery ( P <0.05), and basilar artery stenosis ( P =0.005), ischemia in additional anatomical structures in the posterior circulation ( P <0.001) compared with those with a score ≥7. CONCLUSIONS: Although the pc-ASPECT score alone is insufficient in some cases like vertebral artery dissection, using it together with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score and clinical findings may be beneficial during the hyperacute period of cerebellar ischemia. Presentation with impaired consciousness, basilar artery pathologies, vermian ischemia, and ischemia in additional anatomical structures in the posterior circulation other than the cerebellum appeared as important clinical and radiologic parameters predicting long-term prognosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it