MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205112021 · doi:10.1097/nrl.0000000000000419

Posterior Circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (pc-ASPECT) for the Evaluation of Cerebellar Infarcts

2022· article· en· W4205112021 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Taylan Altiparmak, Bijen Nazlıel, Hale Zeynep Batur Çağlayan, Nil Tokgöz, Aslı Akyol Gürses, Murat Uçar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Neurologist · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineComputed tomographyStroke (engine)Circulation (fluid dynamics)Ischemic strokeRadiologyCardiologyInternal medicineIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Patients with cerebellar ischemic stroke may be misdiagnosed and may exhibit a delayed time to acute stroke treatment compared with patients with anterior circulation ischemic stroke. The posterior circulation Alberta stroke program early computed tomography score (pc-ASPECT) score has been used to evaluate hyperacute stroke, much as the ASPECT in anterior circulation stroke recently. Our main objective was to evaluate the associations of the clinical and etiological characteristics of ischemic cerebellar infarction patients on admission with their pc-ASPECT scores, as well as the correlations of the pc-ASPECT score with morbidity and mortality rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We include 114 patients with cerebellar infarction who underwent 1 year of follow-up into the study. RESULTS: Patients with a pc-ASPECT score <7 were more likely to present with impaired consciousness ( P <0.001), multiple posterior circulation infarcts ( P <0.001), hydrocephalus ( P <0.001), lesions of the vermis ( P =0.028), and peduncle ( P =0.024), perfusion deficits in the total of posterior inferior cerebellar artery, anterior inferior cerebellar artery, superior cerebellar artery ( P <0.05), and basilar artery stenosis ( P =0.005), ischemia in additional anatomical structures in the posterior circulation ( P <0.001) compared with those with a score ≥7. CONCLUSIONS: Although the pc-ASPECT score alone is insufficient in some cases like vertebral artery dissection, using it together with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score and clinical findings may be beneficial during the hyperacute period of cerebellar ischemia. Presentation with impaired consciousness, basilar artery pathologies, vermian ischemia, and ischemia in additional anatomical structures in the posterior circulation other than the cerebellum appeared as important clinical and radiologic parameters predicting long-term prognosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe NeurologistSame topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesFrench-language works237,207