Penser la formation, l’insertion professionnelle et l’exercice d’une profession dans le cadre d’un développement durable des ressources humaines : enjeux et perspectives dans un monde sous tension
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le développement durable est un thème d’actualité dont on peut questionner la récupération lorsqu’appliqué au travail destiné à autrui. Les sept contributions de ce numéro thématique s’ancrent dans les domaines de la gestion, de la santé et de l’éducation. Elles examinent, d’une part, comment la formation améliore la préparation à l’exercice d’une profession, cultive le sens de la gestion socialement responsable, module les dynamiques identitaires de même que les reconversions professionnelles. D’autre part, elles questionnent les répercussions d’une certaine culture managériale et professionnelle sur le sens donné par les travailleurs à leur mission, la reconnaissance de leur expertise, leur satisfaction au travail et leur attachement à l’emploi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it