MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205121379 · doi:10.1109/tmag.2021.3137800

Decoupled Estimation Scheme for PMSMs Toward Accurate Inductance Modeling

2021· article· en· W4205121379 on OpenAlexaff
Ze Li, Wenlong Li, Pengzhao Song, Donovan O'Donnell, Jimi Tjong, Narayan C. Kar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInductanceControl theory (sociology)StatorComputer scienceEstimation theoryTorqueMagnetNonlinear systemProcess (computing)Reliability (semiconductor)Identification schemeIdentification (biology)Quadratic equationControl engineeringAlgorithmEngineeringControl (management)Power (physics)MathematicsPhysicsVoltageMechanical engineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parameter identification of permanent magnet synchronous machines (PMSMs) is critical toward building an accurate machine model, achieving precise control, and improving operational reliability. This article proposes a decoupled estimation scheme for interior PMSM with consideration of magnetic saturation as nonlinear functions of current to improve the inductance estimation accuracy. An improved machine model considering magnetic saturation and cross-coupling effects by utilizing a quadratic model in inductance calculation is developed. Furthermore, the decoupled estimation scheme with considering stator resistance and iron loss resistance can effectively reduce the interaction in the process of parameter identification, and the least square algorithm is employed to improve the computational efficiency. Moreover, this proposed method is especially dedicated to the modern testing solutions that require complex hardware and extensive machine operation while being noninvasive by nature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.797
Threshold uncertainty score0.638

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on MagneticsSame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207