MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

"Validação do teste progressivo da Universidade de Montreal (TPUM) na comunidade escolar de ensino medio da cidade de Talca" Chile

2003· dissertation· pt· W4205122975 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marcelo Castillo-Retamal

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicEducational and Psychological Assessments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Planilhas de collha de dados 90 ANEXO 1.1 Teste de Lactato 90 ANEXO 1.2 Teste de Montreal 91 ANEXO 1.3 Teste Naveta 97 ANEXO 1.4 Teste de Cooper 99 ANEXO 2 Outras Tabelas 100 ANEXO 2.1 Tabela de VO2 máx.segundo Astrand (1992) 100 ANEXO 2.2 Tabela de VO2 máx.(expressado em ml/kg/min), tempo e velocidade de 100 percurso no TPUM (García Manso, 1996) ANEXO 2.3 Tabela de tempos por baliza, TPUM.(Tempos percurso e velocidade 101 máxima) ANEXO 2.4 Tabela de distância percorrida no teste de 12 minutos de carreira e o 102 Respetivo consumo de oxigênio, expressado em ml/kg/min.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.601
Threshold uncertainty score0.803

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducational and Psychological AssessmentsFrench-language works237,207