MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205159092 · doi:10.51777/relief11438

Les fragments d’un retour : le Saint-Césaire d’Un Plat de porc aux bananes vertes

2021· article· fr· W4205159092 on OpenAlexaff
Robert F. Miller, Gloria Onyeoziri-Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueRELIEF - REVUE ÉLECTRONIQUE DE LITTÉRATURE FRANÇAISE · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCaribbean and African Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les multiples références à l’œuvre d’Aimé Césaire dans Un Plat de porc aux bananes vertes (1967) d’André et Simone Schwarz-Bart suggèrent un dialogue, parfois implicite, entre la narratrice/protagoniste Mariotte et son compatriote martiniquais. Cet intertexte dialogique se reflète dans la composition des sept cahiers de Mariotte qui tente d’expliquer aux lecteurs sa lutte pour reconstituer la mémoire de son pays natal dans des conditions dictées, au milieu du XXe siècle, par un système social raciste, oppressif et déshumanisant. Deux figures en particulier de l’œuvre de Césaire se détachent des cahiers de Mariotte, à savoir le Rebelle qu’elle associe à un homme qu’elle a connu quand elle était enfant, et le « vieux nègre dans le tramway », personnage du Cahier d’un retour au pays natal (1939). Mais avant d’assumer elle-même ces deux rôles, Mariotte adresse une prière à « Saint-Césaire », lui demandant de la rejoindre dans son chant mémorial. Dans des notes placées à la fin du texte, les auteurs semblent dire que Mariotte a cité Césaire de façon plutôt cavalière, ce qui crée une certaine ambiguïté au sujet de ce rapport intertextuel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.015
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRELIEF - REVUE ÉLECTRONIQUE DE LITTÉRATURE FRANÇAISESame topicCaribbean and African Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207