MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205171804 · doi:10.21037/jss-21-97

CT guided percutaneous vertebroplasty of C2 osteolytic lesion: a case report and technical note

2022· article· en· W4205171804 on OpenAlexaff
Bilal Tarabay, Véronique Freire, Sung-Joo Yuh, Antoine Gennari, Daniel Shédid, Ghassan Boubez, Zhi Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Spine Surgery · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePercutaneous vertebroplastySedationSurgeryRadiologyPercutaneousVertebral arteryVertebral body

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vertebroplasty is a minimally invasive treatment option for osteolytic spinal lesions. It provides pain relief and stability with established good results. In this paper, we describe a new CT guided percutaneous vertebroplasty technique using a direct lateral approach between the carotid sheath and the vertebral artery, that can be safely performed under conscious sedation in an outpatient setting. We report the case of a patient presenting a lytic lesion of C2 treated using the CT guided percutaneous vertebroplasty under conscious sedation. Local anesthesia using approximately 10 mL of lidocaine 1% was delivered in the skin, soft tissues and to the periosteum of C2. With the patient in dorsal decubitus on the CT table, a bone biopsy needle was introduced laterally, through the parotid and between the carotid artery and vertebral artery. The entry point on C2 was right under the lateral mass of C1 and anterolaterally to the vertebral vascular foramen. The procedure was well tolerated by the patient. No neurological changes were noted per-operatively. No immediate or short-term complications were noted. Patient was observed on a stretcher for 2 hours with nursing supervision before being discharged home. Patient reported satisfactory pain control at 6-month follow-up. CT guided percutaneous vertebroplasty under conscious sedation can be safely performed in an outpatient setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0100.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Spine SurgerySame topicSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207