MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205172296 · doi:10.1049/pbhe033e_ch1

Point-spread functions in inverse scattering and image reconstruction with microwaves and millimeter waves

2021· book-chapter· en· W4205172296 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Tajik, Romina Kazemivala, Natalia K. Nikolova

Bibliographic record

VenueIET eBooks · 2021
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Dose and Imaging
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScatteringMicrowave imagingHolographyOpticsInverse scattering problemPoint spread functionPhysicsMicrowaveIterative reconstructionFourier transformFrequency domainComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chapter Contents: 1.1 Introduction 1.2 System point-spread function (PSF) 1.3 Models of scattering in terms of point-spread functions 1.3.1 Scattering models using convolution 1.3.2 Field-based electromagnetic scattering models 1.3.3 Electromagnetic scattering in terms of S-parameters 1.3.4 Electromagnetic scattering models for real-time inversion 1.4 Extracting the scattering signals from measured data 1.5 Reconstruction with quantitative microwave holography 1.5.1 Microwave holography with analytical PSFs 1.5.2 Basics of quantitative microwave holography (QMH) 1.6 Basics of scattered power mapping (SPM) 1.7 Examples of QMH and SPM 1.8 Advanced signal processing for improved image reconstruction 1.8.1 Apodization filtering 1.8.2 Low-pass filtering in the Fourier domain 1.8.3 PSF translation 1.8.4 Frequency normalization 1.9 Image reconstruction of breast phantom 1.10 Conclusions Acronyms References

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET eBooksSame topicRadiation Dose and ImagingFrench-language works237,207