Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumo: Com esse trabalho, pretende-se estudar um tema pouco analisado na carreira de Oscar Niemeyer. Trata-se do período, na década de 1950, em que o arquiteto carioca, realizou obras para o mercado imobiliário, em franca expansão, na cidade de São Paulo. Examina-se o sistema de trabalho à distância praticado no escri- tório satélite paulistano chefiado pelo arquiteto Carlos Lemos e sua influência sobre a produção das obras. A análise se concentra nos cinco edifícios encomendados pelo Banco Nacional Imobiliário: Califórnia, Mon- treal, Triângulo, Eiffel e Copan. Busca-se, através dela, compreender a forma como a arquitetura de Nieme- yer se adaptou às exigências específicas desse tipo de trabalho e qual a influência desse processo na pos- tura profissional do arquiteto a partir de então. Abstract: This study aims at examining one aspect which has not been very well analyzed in the work of Oscar Nie- meyer: the period, during the 50's, in which the architect designed buildings focusing on the growing (ex- panding) real estate market of the city of São Paulo. It explores the long-distance work system of the satellite office from São Paulo, run by the architect Carlos Lemos, and considers the latter's influence regarding the office's production. The analysis contemplates the five buildings assigned to the office by the Banco Nacio- nal Imobiliário (Real Estate National Bank): Califórnia, Montreal, Triângulo, Eiffel and Copan. Through this analysis, the study intends to understand how Niemeyer's architecture has adapted to the specific demands of this type of work, and also how this process interferes with his professional positioning afterwards.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".