Machine Learning Based Healthcare System for Investigating the Association Between Depression and Quality of Life
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New technological innovations are changing the future of healthcare system. Identification of factors that are responsible for causing depression may lead to new experiments and treatments. Because depression as a disease is becoming a leading community health concern worldwide. Using machine learning techniques this article presents a complete methodological framework to process and explore the heterogenous data and to better understand the association between factors related to quality of life and depression. Subsequently, the experimental study is mainly divided into two parts. In the first part, a data consolidation process is presented. The relationship of data is formed and to uniquely identify each relation in data the concept of the Secure Hash Algorithm is adopted. Hashing is used to locate and index the actual items in the data. The second part proposed a model using both unsupervised and supervised machine learning techniques. The consolidation approach helped in providing a base for formulation and validation of the research hypothesis. The Self organizing map provided 08 cluster solution and the classification problems were taken from the clustered data to further validate the performance of the posterior probability multi-class Support Vector Machine. The expectations of the importance sampling resulted in factors responsible for causing depression. The proposed model was adopted to improve the classification performance, and the result showed classification accuracy of 91.16%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".