Low-Complexity Resource Allocation for Dense Cellular Vehicle-to-Everything (C-V2X) Communications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vehicular communications are the key enabler of traffic reduction and road safety improvement referred to as cellular vehicle-to-everything (C-V2X) communications. Considering the numerous transmitting entities in next generation cellular networks, most existing resource allocation algorithms are impractical or non-effective to ensure reliable C-V2X communications which lead to safe intelligent transportation systems. We study a centralized framework to develop a low-complexity, scalable, and practical resource allocation scheme for dense C-V2X communications. The NP-hard sum-rate maximization resource allocation problem is formulated as a mixed-integer non-linear non-convex optimization problem considering both cellular vehicular links (CVLs) and non-cellular VLs (NCVLs) quality-of-service (QoS) constraints. By assuming that multiple NCVLs can simultaneously reuse a single cellular link (CL), we propose two low-complexity sub-optimal matching-based algorithms in four steps. The first two steps provide a channel-gain-based CVL priority and CL assignment followed by an innovative scalable min-max channel-gain-based CVL-NCVL matching. We propose an analytically proven closed-form fast feasibility check theorem as the third step. The objective function is transformed into a difference of convex (DC) form and the power allocation problem is solved optimally using majorization-minimization (MaMi) method and interior point methods as the last step. Numerical results verify that our schemes are scalable and effective for dense C-V2X communications. The low-complexity and practicality of the proposed schemes for dense cellular networks is also shown. Furthermore, it is shown that the proposed schemes outperform other methods up to %6 in terms of overall sum-rate in dense scenarios and have a near optimal performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".