MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205210610 · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2021.3134818

Estimation of Inertia for Synchronous and Non-Synchronous Generators Based on Ambient Measurements

2021· article· en· W4205210610 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInertiaPermanent magnet synchronous generatorElectric power systemSynchronous motorComputer scienceAutomatic Generation ControlControl theory (sociology)Control engineeringEngineeringPower (physics)Electrical engineeringPhysicsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The inertia information of both synchronous generators (SGs)/equivalent SGs and converter interfaced generators (CIGs) are crucial to maintain the frequency stability of modern power grids. This paper proposes a novel data-driven method using ambient measurements, which seems to be the first method that can estimate the inertia constants of SGs/equivalent SGs and the virtual inertia constants of CIGs simultaneously without disturbing the system’s normal operating condition. Numerical studies in the IEEE 68-bus system demonstrate that the developed estimation method can estimate the inertia constants of different generation units accurately and is robust to measurement noises, missing measurements and the variation of operating conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.833

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it