MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205210610 · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2021.3134818

Estimation of Inertia for Synchronous and Non-Synchronous Generators Based on Ambient Measurements

2021· article· en· W4205210610 on OpenAlexafffund
Jinpeng Guo, Xiaozhe Wang, Boon‐Teck Ooi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInertiaPermanent magnet synchronous generatorElectric power systemSynchronous motorComputer scienceAutomatic Generation ControlControl theory (sociology)Control engineeringEngineeringPower (physics)Electrical engineeringPhysicsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The inertia information of both synchronous generators (SGs)/equivalent SGs and converter interfaced generators (CIGs) are crucial to maintain the frequency stability of modern power grids. This paper proposes a novel data-driven method using ambient measurements, which seems to be the first method that can estimate the inertia constants of SGs/equivalent SGs and the virtual inertia constants of CIGs simultaneously without disturbing the system’s normal operating condition. Numerical studies in the IEEE 68-bus system demonstrate that the developed estimation method can estimate the inertia constants of different generation units accurately and is robust to measurement noises, missing measurements and the variation of operating conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power SystemsSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207