MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205219652 · doi:10.5430/jct.v11n1p117

The Impact of Media Culture on Future Professionals’ Training

2022· article· en· W4205219652 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Curriculum and Teaching · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInnovative Educational Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionPsychologyControl (management)Competence (human resources)Scale (ratio)Relevance (law)Information technologySocial psychologyComputer sciencePolitical scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The relevance of the research is substantiated by the fact that the information society can be addressed as a stage in the modern civilization formation, which is characterized by the increasing role of knowledge, information, as well as information processing technologies. The number of people employed in the information sphere is growing steadily. The information products and information services are gaining additional shares in the market. It is specifically the prerequisites for a future specialist to have high media and cultural competence to tackle current challenges. The research aims to ascertain experimentally the pedagogical conditions for media culture formation and its impact on future professionals’ training. The study was conducted using such tools as questionnaires and testing. Diagnosis of cognitive interest (according to N. Kuzmina’s scale), the scale for assessing students' operational skills (according to M. Chobitko), Pearson's criterion (chi-square). In the experimental group, only 1.9% of students at the control stage of the experiment corresponded to the low level of media culture according to the cognitive criterion, while in the control group there were 18.4% f students. However, in the experimental group at the control stage of the experiment more than 61% of respondents yielded a high level of media culture according to the cognitive criterion. That said, in the experimental group only 1.9% respondents at the control stage of the experiment corresponded to a low level of media culture according to the cognitive criterion. The obtained results give grounds to argue that media culture formation has a positive effect on the future professionals’ training. This is due to the fact that media culture is underlying the general professional competence of the XXI century specialist. The enhancement of the students training through the use of new information and Internet technologies has all chances to be one of the prospects for further research in the relative to the issue addressed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.553
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it