Abstract 125: Perturbation of Mitochondrial Calcium Uniporter Promotes Cardiac Oxidative Stress and Autophagy During Heart Failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mitochondrial calcium ([Ca 2+ ] m ) is essential for cardiomyocyte viability, and aberration of [Ca 2+ ] m is known to elicit multiple cardiac stress conditions associated with ATP depletion, reactive oxygen species, and mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening, all of which can lead to metabolic stress and the loss of dysfunctional mitochondria by aberrant autophagy. Elucidating the regulatory role of m itochondrial c alcium u niporter (MCU)-mediated [Ca 2+ ] m in modulating cardiac mitochondrial bioenergetics and autophagy has high significance and clinical impact for many pathophysiological processes. [Ca 2+ ] m is exquisitely controlled by the inner mitochondrial membrane uniporter, transporters, regulators and exchangers including MCU, MCUR1, EMRE, MICU1, MICU2 and LETM1. Our recently published findings revealed that Mitochondrial Ca 2+ Uniporter Regulator 1 (MCUR1) serves as a scaffold factor for uniporter complex assembly. We found that deletion of MCUR1 impaired [Ca 2+ ] m uptake, mitochondrial Ca 2+ current ( I MCU ) and mitochondrial bioenergetics and is associated with increased autophagy. Our new findings indicate that the impairment of [Ca 2+ ] m uptake exacerbated autophagy following ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury. In support of our mouse model, human failing hearts show that MCUR1 protein levels are markedly decreased and autophagy markers are increased, demonstrating a crucial link between [Ca 2+ ] m uptake and autophagy during heart failure. Additionally, our results reveal that either oxidation or disruption of human MCU Cys-97 (in mouse Cys-96; gain-of-function MCU C96A mutant) produces a conformational change within the N terminal β-grasp fold of MCU which promotes higher-order MCU complex assembly and increased I MCU activity and mitochondrial ROS levels. The results of our studies using a novel cardiac-specific MCUR1-KO model and a constitutively active global MCU C96A KI mouse model (CRISPR-Cas9 genome edited) elucidate the regulatory role of [Ca 2+ ] m in cardiac bioenergetics and autophagy during oxidative stress and myocardial infarction. Thus, targeting assembly and the activity of MCU complex will offer a new potential therapeutic target in the treatment of cardiomyopathy and heart failure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".