MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205225366 · doi:10.1111/vox.13130

International Forum on Policies and Practice for Transfusion of <scp>ABO</scp> and <scp>RhD</scp> Non‐Identical Platelets: Responses

2021· article· en· W4205225366 on OpenAlexaff
Rebecca Cardigan, Helen V. New, Lise J Estcourt, Е Б Жибурт, Rounak Dubey, Jesper Bengtsson, Magnus Jöud, Carlos Castillo, Joan Cid, Miquel Lozano, Dhana Gounder, Peter Flanagan, Sarah L. Morley, Gwen Clarke, Dana V. Devine, Salwa Hindawi, Aqeel AlOtaibi, Carolina Bonnet Bub, José Mauro Kutner, Toshiyuki Ikeda, Naoko Goto, Hitoshi Okazaki, Magali J. Fontaine, Jeremiah Pasion, Linda Song, Tom Latham, Jean‐Louis Kerkhoffs, Masja de Haas, Jaap Jan Zwaginga, Birgit Gathof, Katharina Ommer, France Pirenne, Michel Raba, Anne Isabelle François, James Daly, Tanya Powley, Nancy M. Dunbar

Bibliographic record

VenueVox Sanguinis · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood groups and transfusion
Canadian institutionsCanadian Blood Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsABO blood group systemPlateletABO incompatibilityMedicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have apheresis (70%) and whole blood derived (buffy coat) (30%).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score0.739

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVox SanguinisSame topicBlood groups and transfusionFrench-language works237,207