MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4205229274 · doi:10.1002/alz.051360

Analysis of brain structural connectivity networks and white matter integrity in patients with mild cognitive impairment

2021· article· en· W4205229274 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maurizio Bergamino, Ryan R. Walsh, Ashley M. Stokes

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive impairmentWhite matterFractional anisotropyDiffusion MRICognitionPsychologyMedicineNuclear medicineInternal medicineNeuroscienceMagnetic resonance imagingRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is considered a prodromal phase of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and patients with MCI convert to AD at a rate of about 10–15% per year. Because of this high conversion rate to AD, studies of MCI may yield insight into early pathological changes in AD. Here, we used a novel approach to analyze structural connectivity and white matter (WM) integrity using fractional anisotropy (FA), intra‐cellular (IC), extra‐cellular (EC), and isotropic (ISO) maps between patients with MCI and healthy controls (HC). Method Thirty‐two HC (age mean ± S.D. = 69 ± 6 years; 22 females) and 20 MCI (71 ± 9 years; 7 females) were included in this study. All subjects completed the Mini‐Mental State Exam (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Multi‐shell DTI were download from ADNI (http://adni.loni.usc.edu/). Pre‐processing was performed by Mrtrix3, FSL, and ANTs. Tractography was performed with 5 million seeds using the iFOD2 algorithm. Connectome was generated from the Desikan‐Killiany parcellation file and was subsequently filtered using the COMMIT2 algorithm. A three‐compartment Stick‐Zeppelin‐Ball model was used to create the IC, the EC, and the ISO compartments, respectively. Statistical analyses (ANCOVA) were performed by connectomestats (Mrtrix3), randomise (FLS), and by an in‐house Matlab script for Spearman’s correlations. Result The two groups did differ in MMSE and MoCA (Mann–Whitney U test: Z=2.031; p=0.021; Z=1.683; p=0.046, respectively). Differences between HC and MCI were found principally in the fornix for FA and in several WM areas for IC and ISO (Figure 1, Table 1). Connectometry analysis found differences between groups in two distinct tracts: Tract#1 between the left‐lateraloccipital and the left‐insula (t=4.25, p=0.023) and Tract#2 between the left‐middletemporal and the left‐parsopercularis (t=3.34, p=0.013) (Figure 2). Figure 3 and Table 2 show the results for the correlations between DTI metrics and the neurological scores. Conclusion In this study, by using a multi‐shell diffusion MRI acquisition and robust processing of DTI data, we detected alterations in WM integrity and structural connectivity in MCI subjects. Our results demonstrate the potential of these advanced diffusion MRI methods as biomarkers to distinguish MCI and HC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→