MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205229532 · doi:10.3917/anpsy.123.0465

L’« effet Flynn » et ses paradoxes

2012· article· fr· W4205229532 on OpenAlexaff
Serge Larivée, Carole Sénéchal, Pierre Audy

Bibliographic record

VenueL’Année psychologique · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicCognitive Abilities and Testing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Ce texte comprend deux parties. Dans la première, nous rappelons brièvement les causes possibles de l’effet Flynn. Par la suite, nous consacrons la majeure partie du texte à discuter de cinq paradoxes susceptibles de remettre en question la pertinence des interprétations de l’effet Flynn : le paradoxe du retard mental chez nos ancêtres, le paradoxe des jumeaux ou comment la génétique joue un rôle, le paradoxe du facteur g ou gf contre gc , le paradoxe de l’absence apparente de boum culturel et le paradoxe des familles nombreuses. En plus de commenter ce dernier paradoxe, nous répondrons à trois questions : la dysgénie est-elle à l’œuvre, l’effet Flynn a-t-il atteint sa limite et à qui profite l’effet Flynn ?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.499
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueL’Année psychologiqueSame topicCognitive Abilities and TestingFrench-language works237,207