MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205239827 · doi:10.2514/6.2022-0103

Hyperparameters Effect in Deep Convolutional Neural Network Model on Prediction of Fiber Orientation Distribution in Prepreg Platelet Molded Composites

2022· article· en· W4205239827 on OpenAlexaff
Richard A. Larson, Reshad Hoque, Von Clyde Jamora, Jiang Li, Sergii G. Kravchenko, Oleksandr G. Kravchenko

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Material Mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperparameterConvolutional neural networkFinite element methodOrientation (vector space)Materials scienceArtificial neural networkFiberComposite materialComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceStructural engineeringGeometryMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

View Video Presentation: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2022-0103.vid A framework is developed for the prediction of the meso-structure of prepreg platelet molded composites (PPMC) via machine learning. Finite element modeling is used to model different morphology PPMC plates subjected to a change in temperature. From these finite element models, surface strain data and local through thickness fiber orientation distribution tensor (a_ij) terms are extracted. A U-Net architecture deep convolutional neural network is trained to predict the local through the thickness a_ij terms from virtual PPMC plate surface strain data. The predictive capability is evaluated for U-Nets trained with different hyperparameters and compared to predictions made by a simpler artificial neural network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIAA SCITECH 2022 ForumSame topicComposite Material MechanicsFrench-language works237,207