Faculty Opinions recommendation of NMR spectroscopy reveals the solution dimerization interface of p53 core domains bound to their consensus DNA.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The p53 protein is a transcription factor that acts as the major tumor suppressor in mammals. The core DNA-binding domain is mutated in about 50% of all human tumors. The crystal structure of the core domain in complex with DNA illustrated how a single core domain specifically interacts with its DNA consensus site and how it is inactivated by mutation. However, no structural information for the tetrameric full-length p53-DNA complex is available. Here, we present novel experimental insight into the dimerization of two p53 core domains upon cooperative binding to consensus DNA in solution obtained by NMR. The NMR data show that the p53 core domain itself does not appear to undergo major conformational changes upon addition of DNA and elucidate the dimerization interface between two DNA-bound core domains, which includes the short H1 helix. A NMR-based model for the dimeric p53 core-DNA complex incorporates these data and allows the conclusion that the dimerization interface also forms the actual interface in the tetrameric p53-DNA complex. The significance of this interface is further corroborated by the finding that hot spot mutations map to the H1 helix, and by the binding of the putative p53 inhibitor 53BP2 to this region via one of its ankyrin repeats. Based on symmetry considerations it is proposed that tetrameric p53 might link non-contiguous DNA consensus sites in a sandwich-like manner generating DNA loops as observed for transcriptionally active p53 complexes. PMID: 11606582
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.325 | 0.159 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".