Gevolgen van een verbod op driesierteeltplanten : Phytolacca americana, Pistia stratiotes en Celastrus orbiculatus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dit onderzoek richt zich op het inschatten van de omschakelingstermijn die nodig is voor telers om naar een alternatieve gewas over te stappen als gevolg van een mogelijk verbod op drie invasieve exoten: de Phytolacca americana, Pistia stratiotes en Celastrus orbiculatus.Om die inschatting te kunnen maken is het nodig om te weten wat de financiële gevolgen zijn voor de telers.Er is gebruikgemaakt van desk research en field research.Ook hebben interviews met telers en vertegenwoordigers van organisaties plaatsgevonden.This research focuses on an estimation of the required conversion period for growers to switch to an alternative crop as a result of a possible ban on three invasive exotics: the Phytolacca americana, Pistia stratiotes and Celastrus orbiculatus.For this estimation it is necessary to know the financial impacts for growers.Desk research and field research methods were used.Also, growers and organisations' representatives have been interviewed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".