Le Cercle de sécurité parental, une intervention prometteuse pour le développement de la fonction réflexive parentale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La présente étude a pour objectif d’examiner l’efficacité de l’intervention Cercle de sécurité parental (COSP) (Cooper, et al. , 2009) qui vise à favoriser un attachement sécurisant chez les enfants d’âge préscolaire, notamment en stimulant le développement de la fonction réflexive parentale (FRP). Deux groupes de 12 mères ont été soumis à des mesures pré- et post-test, l’un d’eux ayant reçu l’intervention et l’autre non. Les résultats ont révélé une augmentation de la FRP chez les mères ayant reçu l’intervention alors qu’aucun effet n’a été observé chez les mères du groupe de contrôle, suggérant ainsi que l’augmentation est attribuable à l’intervention. Ces résultats confirment les bienfaits de l’intervention auprès d’une population à faible risque et appuient son utilisation au sein des services publics de première ligne et communautaires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".