Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reviewed by: Wolsey by Glenn Richardson Sally Fisher Richardson, Glenn, Wolsey (Routledge Historical Biographies), New York, Routledge, 2020; ebook; pp. 338; 5 b/w illustrations; R.R.P. AU $60.29; ISBN 9781003056263. John Skelton's satirical poem directed against the rise of Thomas Wolsey, Why Come Ye Nat to Court (1521–22), asks: 'Why come ye nat to court? To which court?'(ll. 398–99). Surely the residence of the butcher's son from Ipswich could not be mistaken for that of the English king? Skelton's lines feature in Glenn Richardson's recent contribution to scholarship on the English cardinal who fell so spectacularly from grace, drawing attention to material display at the Tudor court and the inherent danger in seeking to rise above one's allotted station in life. [End Page 251] Richardson is well established as an historian of the Tudor court and Renaissance monarchy, having explored the 1520 diplomatic meeting between Henry VIII and Francis I in The Field of Cloth of Gold (Yale University Press, 2013) and analysed the reigns of Henry VIII, Francis I, and Charles V in Renaissance Monarchy (Bloomsbury Academic, 2002). This latest offering is an obvious successor to his study of the Field of the Cloth of Gold, across which Wolsey is omnipresent. Richardson acknowledges that Wolsey has endured as a popular and often polarizing figure for historical enquiry and literary representations. His historiographical survey deftly moves from George Cavendish's contemporary biography of Wolsey (1556–58) to recent scholarship, noting growing interest in Wolsey's role in foreign affairs. After an overview encompassing A. F. Pollard's biography Wolsey (Longmans, 1929), J. J. Scarisbrick's discussion of Wolsey within his biography Henry VIII (University of California Press, 1968), and Peter Gwyn's biography The King's Cardinal: The Rise and Fall of Thomas Wolsey (Barrie & Jenkins, 1990), Richardson confronts the inevitable question: why another book on Wolsey? He argues that the justification for this work lies in its dialogue between past research and contemporary thought and his own research on Wolsey's European diplomacy. The book is structured chronologically, around three major themes: Wolsey's role in international affairs, with attention to his management of the relationship between Henry, Francis, and Charles; Wolsey's governmental, secular, and sacred activities within England; and his political, cultural, and educational patronage. Chapter 1 traces Wolsey's early life and career trajectory as Wolsey's ascent is connected to his support of war against France and his treatment of Henry as a young man and as a king. By chapter's close, Henry has gained experience on a European battlefield and Wolsey is Archbishop of York. Chapter 2 explores Wolsey's involvement in foreign affairs, celebrated in the 1520 meeting at the Field of the Cloth of Gold, by which time he was a cardinal and a papal legate a latere. On Wolsey's use of material display, Richardson discusses the arrival of Wolsey's cardinal's hat in a slightly different and credible light, drawing attention to Wolsey's rise and the associated elevation of Henry and England. The third chapter concentrates on English events, with a focus on Wolsey in council and court. Tensions between the king, his nobles, and Wolsey are recognized as ongoing concerns, as Richardson outlines how Wolsey worked to limit opportunities for nobles to advise Henry. His speculative term 'the cardinal-courtier' suggests the problems and opportunities presented to Wolsey by proximity to the king. Chapter 4 assesses Wolsey as cardinal legate, concentrating on his working relationship with Rome and the English church. Richardson highlights Wolsey's belief in education as critical to the defence of orthodoxy. The fifth chapter examines Wolsey's cultural and educational patronage, his wealth, and his household. If the reader seeks to ask how one might think there were two royal courts in England, the answer is here. [End Page 252] Chapter 6 returns to Wolsey's peacekeeping efforts. As transitions from war to peace are charted, Richardson shows how easily one could lose the king's favour, hinting, too, that events on the European stage would be shaped by Henry's desire to annul his marriage with Katherine. The seventh chapter...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.244 | 0.181 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".