MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205259281 · doi:10.2523/98376-ms

Creating a Culture of Safe Driving Behaviors

2006· article· en· W4205259281 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patrick Karowich, Colin Mallett, Cindy Woods, Heather Cowie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCrime, Deviance, and Social Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsCitationEngineeringAbu dhabiLibrary scienceWorld Wide WebGeographyComputer scienceArchaeologyMetropolitan area

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Creating a Culture of Safe Driving Behaviors Patrick Karowich; Patrick Karowich Halliburton Co. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Colin Dennis Mallett; Colin Dennis Mallett Halliburton Co. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Cindy Woods; Cindy Woods Halliburton Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Heather Cowie Heather Cowie Halliburton Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE International Health, Safety & Environment Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, April 2006. Paper Number: SPE-98376-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/98376-MS Published: April 02 2006 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Karowich, Patrick, Mallett, Colin Dennis, Woods, Cindy, and Heather Cowie. "Creating a Culture of Safe Driving Behaviors." Paper presented at the SPE International Health, Safety & Environment Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, April 2006. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/98376-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Health, Safety, Environment, and Sustainability Search Advanced Search AbstractWithin the oil and gas industry, and in particular Canada, driving to and from the lease site poses the greatest risk to employees. Given the variety of driving terrains, changing weather conditions, remoteness of the wellsite and driver complacency, the driving risk also represents the greatest challenge for making improvements.At Halliburton Group Canada, several approaches have been used in an attempt to reduce both the severity and frequency of motor vehicle collisions. The approach taken involved primarily behavior-based strategies, but also utilized traditional approaches to driver related behavior management such as policies and driver education.By examining the lagging indicators related to our various product service lines, we have observed a continued decrease year over year in the number of severe collisions. In 2000, Halliburton Group Canada was driving approximately 400,000 miles between serious wrecks. Today, with the systems in place, this number has significantly increased to over 2,500,000 miles.With these statistics in mind and utilizing a more traditional or compliance-based approach to driving-related issues, a decrease in the overall number of motor vehicle-related issues would also have been expected. However, with the positive behavioral approach taken, the opposite has been observed. During the same time, a significant increase in the reporting of the more minor fender benders and near misses was observed. In a completely compliance, or traditional approach, these types of incidents would have gone unreported and been dealt with on a reactive basis.This case study will provide evidence supporting our belief that creating a culture of acceptable driving behaviors through behavior-based changes can have a significant, longer-term impact that provides sustainability.IntroductionSince the invention of motorized transport, humans have found ways to push the limits of the machines they control, sometimes beyond their control. This constant impetus to go faster has led to improvements in the design and capabilities of vehicles. However, despite this, the world has observed and will continue to observe, significant human tragedy. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the loss of life created by the motorized vehicle far surpasses all casualties associated with the wars the USA has been involved in since the Korean War. Road traffic injuries are expected to take third place in the ranking of disease burden by the year 2020, as shown in Table 1. Keywords: Upstream Oil & Gas, information, seatbelt, personnel, motor vehicle, transportation safety, vehicle collision, Health & Medicine, incident, journey manager Subjects: Safety, Transportation safety This content is only available via PDF. 2006. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCrime, Deviance, and Social ControlFrench-language works237,207