MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4205328639 · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27890-5

Author Correction: Computational tools for genomic data de-identification: facilitating data protection law compliance

2022· erratum· en· W4205328639 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander Bernier, Hanshi Liu, Bartha Maria Knoppers

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2022
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicLaw, AI, and Intellectual Property
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Compliance (psychology)Computer scienceComputational biologyData scienceData miningBiologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The original version of this Article listed the wrong reference in the first position in the Reference list. The original reference in the first position read as ‘1. Greenleaf, G. Jamaica adopts a post-GDPR Data Privacy Law. Priv. Laws Int. Bus. Rep. 1 , 3–5 (2021).’ The correct reference is ‘1. Greenleaf, G. Global Data Privacy Laws 2021: Despite COVID Delays, 145 Laws Show GDPR Dominance. Priv. Laws Int. Bus. Rep. 1 , 3–5 (2021).’

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.143
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.143
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0110.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0800.052

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.290
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.094 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature Communications→Same topicLaw, AI, and Intellectual Property→French-language works237,207→