Description a New Species of Genus <i>Kurixalus</i> (Amphibia: Anura: Rhacophoridae) from Chengdu Prefecture, Sichuan Province, China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eight specimens of frilled swamp tree frogs of Genus Kurixalus were collected from Pingle Town, Qionglai County, Chengdu Prefecture, Sichuan Province, China in April to May 2020. Based on morphological and molecular evidence, we describe these specimens as a new species of Kurixalus . Kurixalus silvaenaias sp. Nov., which are similar to K. idiootocus in appearance and phylogenetically are sister to each other, but morphologically the former can be distinguished from K. idiootocus and other congeners by the following combination of characters: body size 29.6-32.9 mm in males; single internal vocal sac; snout obtuse and rounded with no obvious dermal prominence on tip; vomerine teeth present; nuptial pads less developed, present on the base of first finger in males; throat coarsely granulated; tuberculated dorsal and lateral skin; outer metacarpal tubercles present; dorsal surface yellowish brown with a large hourglass shaped dark brown marking and without any green speckles; pair of large symmetrical dark blotches on chest; and abdomen dark purple. The new species is the first record of Kurixalus in Sichuan, China.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".