MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205363722 · doi:10.1364/fio.2021.fm2e.2

FWM Frequency Generation in Topological Floquet Defect Mode Resonance

2021· article· en· W4205363722 on OpenAlexaff
Tyler J. Zimmerling, Shirin Afzal, Vien Van

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Optics + Laser Science 2021 · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFloquet theoryResonance (particle physics)Lattice (music)Topology (electrical circuits)Four-wave mixingPhysicsMode (computer interface)OpticsOptoelectronicsNonlinear opticsComputer scienceAtomic physicsQuantum mechanicsEngineeringAcousticsNonlinear systemElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We demonstrate frequency generation by four-wave mixing using novel cavityless Floquet defect mode resonance in 2D silicon microring Floquet topological lattice, achieving a conversion efficiency enhancement of 12.5 dB over the edge mode alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.215
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Optics + Laser Science 2021Same topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207