MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205365297 · doi:10.1049/et.2021.0608

All eyes on the sun [History Geomagnetism]

2021· article· en· W4205365297 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering & Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEarthquake Detection and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEarth's magnetic fieldGeomagnetic stormStormIonosphereGeographyMeteorologyGeologyOceanographyClimatologyPhysicsMagnetic fieldGeophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the course of three days in May 1921, a series of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) hit the Earth as three major geomagnetic storms. During a geomagnetic storm, the magnetic field of the Earth fluctuates wildly over the course of a few minutes or hours. These fluctuations are larger closer to the Earth's poles, but during very large storms, the magnetic field variation is wide and extends further. During May 1921, towns and cities all over the world reported strange events. There were dazzling twilight displays of aurora borealis (created by electrically charged particles from the Sun) but at latitudes far lower than usual. Intense aurora sightings were reported in England and France, and as far south as San Antonio, Texas, and the island of Tongatabu in the South Pacific. On one morning observers reported at least five peaks of major intensity in a five-hour period across Europe and North America. Electrical surges also caused damage to trans-Atlantic cables, interrupting shipping signals along the west coast of North America and the Philippines. There was disruption to telegraph traffic in Europe and North America, and to telephone exchanges. Sparks at one exchange caused a fire in Karlstad in Sweden and long-distance telephone lines in an exchange at New Brunswick, Canada, were burned out. Conversely, there were reports of enhanced long-distance radio signals over the Atlantic and the Pacific, as enhanced ionisation resulted in stronger signals. New York stations received stronger signals from Berlin and Bordeaux, while links between stations in Samoa and Awanui, north of New Zealand, were recorded as “unusually good”.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it