MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4205374794 · doi:10.47363/jonrr/2021(2)126

Higher and Increasing Incidence of Cancer between the Age of 20-49 Years in the UAE Population; A Focus Analysis of the UAE National Cancer Registry Data 2015-2017

2021· article· en· W4205374794 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Humaid O. Al‐Shamsi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Oncology Research Review & Reports · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncidence (geometry)Cancer registryMedicineDemographyCancerPopulationBreast cancerColorectal cancerChristian ministryCancer incidenceCancer preventionEnvironmental healthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is accumulating evidence that cancer incidence is increasing in younger adults. An earlier report indicating a higher incidence of breast and colorectal cancer in the younger population in the UAE. Open access data from the UAE National Cancer Registry (UAE-NCR) from the Ministry of Health and Prevention (MOHAP) for 2017 were extracted. Estimated data from the International. Agency for Research on Cancer ( IARC ) for Saudi Arabia, Canada, United Kingdom, China, and India for the year 2020 were also extracted and analyzed. When analyzing the 2017 UAE published data with restriction to the age group between 20-49 years of age for both UAE citizens and Non-UAE citizens, The data indicates that, the percentage of cancer incidence in this age group was 45.4% from total number of new malignant cancer cases in 2017, compared with 42.4% in 2015 and 42.7% in 2016. In females the percentage of cancer incidence in this age group was 51.3% from total number of new malignant cancer cases among females in 2017, and 38.3% among males in the same year, compared with 2016 data (49.5% among females and 34.9% among males) and 2015 data (49.9% among females and 34.1% among males), data indicates that, there is a clear trend for an increase in the incidence annual percent change in this age group by 3% (from 42.4% in 2015 to 45.4% in 2017). This increased persisted regardless of sex (males increased incidence by 4.2% from 34.1 % in 2015 to 38.3% in 2017 while in females increased incidence by 1.4% from 49.9% to 51.3%), which more females were diagnosed with cancer at the age of 20-49 than males between 2015 and 2017.When re-analyzing the 2017 data and restriction to the UAE citizens population only with the age group of 20-49, the percentage of cancer incidence remains high at 37.2% (42.4% among females and 28.9% among males). The percentage of cancer incidence in this age group between 20-49 years of age in Saudi Arabia is 39.49% which is comparable to the UAE, yet these incidence rates are extremely high compared with the following countries; Canada 8% (p < 0.005), USA 8.75% (p < 0.005) , United Kingdom 8.33% (p < 0.005), China 16.15% (p < 0.005) and India 26.75% (p < 0.005). The current data indicated an increase in the cancer incidence in the UAE in the age group of 20 – 49 years of age. The incidence is alarming and requires focused research to address potential risk factors. Cancer screening is a vital component in reducing cancer mortality, yet utility and cost-effectiveness has not been evaluated fully in the younger population. UAE-based research to evaluate screening due to the higher incidence may be required to be addressed. A more collaborative regional and global effort is a must to address this global alarming phenomenon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.380
GPT teacher head0.563
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Oncology Research Review & Reports→Same topicGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening→French-language works237,207→