MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205383133 · doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00198.2021

Role of SERCA and sarcolipin in adaptive muscle remodeling

2022· review· en· W4205383133 on OpenAlexafffund
Paige J. Chambers, Emma Sara Juracic, Val A. Fajardo, A. Russell Tupling

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsBrock UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsSERCASkeletal muscleCell biologyDownregulation and upregulationMitochondrial biogenesisEndoplasmic reticulumMuscle hypertrophyBiologyChemistryInternal medicineEndocrinologyATPaseBiochemistryMedicineMitochondrion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sarcolipin (SLN) is a small regulatory protein that inhibits the sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum Ca 2+ -ATPase (SERCA) pump. When bound to SERCA, SLN reduces the apparent Ca 2+ affinity of SERCA and uncouples SERCA Ca 2+ transport from its ATP consumption. As such, SLN plays a direct role in altering skeletal muscle relaxation and energy expenditure. Interestingly, the expression of SLN is dynamic during times of muscle adaptation, in that large increases in SLN content are found in response to development, atrophy, overload, and disease. Several groups have suggested that increases in SLN, especially in dystrophic muscle, are deleterious as it may reduce muscle function and exacerbate already abhorrent intracellular Ca 2+ levels. However, there is also significant evidence to show that increased SLN content is a beneficial adaptive mechanism that protects the SERCA pump and activates Ca 2+ signaling and adaptive remodeling during times of cell stress. In this review, we first discuss the role for SLN in healthy muscle during both development and overload, where SLN has been shown to activate Ca 2+ signaling to promote mitochondrial biogenesis, fiber-type shifts, and muscle hypertrophy. Then, with respect to muscle disease, we summarize the discrepancies in the literature as to whether SLN upregulation is adaptive or maladaptive in nature. This review is the first to offer the concept of SLN hormesis in muscle disease, wherein both too much and too little SLN are detrimental to muscle health. Finally, the underlying mechanisms which activate SLN upregulation are discussed, specifically acknowledging a potential positive feedback loop between SLN and Ca 2+ signaling molecules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Cell PhysiologySame topicAdipose Tissue and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207