MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205389309 · doi:10.12927/cjnl.2021.26686

Commentary – The Future of Advanced Practice Nursing: What’s Next for Canada and the World?

2021· article· en· W4205389309 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Michelle Acorn

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing leadership · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNursing Roles and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCLARITYScope of practiceWorkforceScope (computer science)Health careNursingHealth human resourcesMedicinePolitical sciencePublic relationsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advanced practice nurses' (APNs') role definition, education, regulation, scope of practice, working conditions and integration vary worldwide. Clarity and alignment of foundational APN tenets can strengthen future workforce harmonization, innovation and models of care and data reliability for discussions and decision making. This global clarity and consistency can inform the design, delivery and leadership aspiring for health, education and socio-economic systems. Healthcare demands related to the COVID-19 pandemic, opioid crisis, aging population, non-communicable diseases, natural disasters and climate change have exposed glaring health needs and taxed workforces' and service capacity locally and globally. A fulsome deployment of nurse practitioners is one strategy that could help mitigate the impacts of these forces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.697
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNursing leadershipSame topicNursing Roles and PracticesFrench-language works237,207