The updated <scp>basti</scp> stellar evolution models and isochrones – III. White dwarfs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT We present new cooling models for carbon–oxygen white dwarfs (WDs) with both H- and He-atmospheres, covering the whole relevant mass range, to extend our updated basti (a Bag of Stellar Tracks and Isochrones) stellar evolution archive. They have been computed using core chemical stratifications obtained from new progenitor calculations, adopting a semi-empirical initial–final mass relation. The physics inputs have been updated compared to our previous basti calculations: 22Ne diffusion in the core is now included, together with an updated CO phase diagram, and updated electron conduction opacities. We have calculated models with various different neon abundances in the core, suitable to study WDs in populations with metallicities ranging from supersolar to metal poor, and have performed various tests/comparisons of the chemical stratification and cooling times of our models. Two complete sets of calculations are provided, for two different choices of the electron conduction opacities, to reflect the current uncertainty in the evaluation of the electron thermal conductivity in the transition regime between moderate and strong degeneracy, crucial for the H- and He-envelopes. We have also made a first, preliminary estimate of the effect – that turns out to be generally small – of Fe sedimentation on the cooling times of WD models, following recent calculations of the phase diagrams of carbon–oxygen-iron mixtures. We make publicly available the evolutionary tracks from both sets of calculations, including cooling times and magnitudes in the Johnson-Cousins, Sloan, Pan-STARSS, GALEX, Gaia-DR2, Gaia-eDR3, HST-ACS, HST-WFC3, and JWST photometric systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".