On a Little-Known Slavic-Moldavian Copy of the Old Russian “Parables of Wives”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article presents a textual analysis and a publication of a little-known copy of the anonymous Old Russian text “Parables of Wives” (“Pritchi o zhenakh”), found in a handwritten Slavic Horologion with additional articles in the Russian State Library (Fond 209, No. 201). The manuscript is of Moldavian origin and dates back to the first quarter of the 16th century. It is established that literary sources of the entries that constitute the “Parables of Wives” are mainly didactic statements from the florilegia The Bee (Pchela, Melissa) and Menander. The discovered text is a special compiled redaction of the “Parables”. The author did not simply select individual entries from those florilegia but also changed the order in which the aphorisms appear compared to their position in The Bee and Menander. At the same time, he partly edited their content. Most likely, the Moldavian copyist had a corrupted copy of the “Parables of Wives” in front of him, which he could not copy correctly, thus preserving its erroneous readings in his copy
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".