Gemeinsam die digitale Zukunft gestalten
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vertreter*innen der Deutschen Atemwegsliga e. V., des Bundesverbandes der Pneumologen (BdP), des Verbandes Pneumologischer Kliniken e. V. (VPK), von Alpha1-Deutschland e. V., der AG Lungensport in Deutschland e. V. und der Arbeitsgruppe eHealth des Fördervereins der Deutschen Atemwegsliga e. V. diskutierten im April 2021 im Rahmen eines Online-Workshops die Vor- und Nachteile telemedizinischer Konzepte und der Durchführung von Videosprechstunden. Das Angebot von Videosprechstunden war während der COVID-19-Pandemie stark gestiegen. In vorangegangenen Workshops hatte sich die Deutsche Atemwegsliga e. V. bereits mit den Chancen und Herausforderungen der Einführung digitaler Hilfsmittel, dem gesundheitspolitischen Rahmen sowie Anwendungsmöglichkeiten digitaler Gesundheitsanwendungen (DiGA) im Fachgebiet Pneumologie auseinandergesetzt [ 1 ]. Publication History Article published online: 15 September 2021 © 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.077 | 0.024 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".