MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205430142 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-cmpvm

Disposable spectrofluidic devices for attenuated total reflection infrared spectroscopy: characterization sensitivity, spatial resolution and generally applicable to multiple device types

2022· preprint· en· W4205430142 on OpenAlexafffund
Nan Jia, A Bouchard, Tianyang Deng, Leon Torres de Oliveira, André Bégin‐Drolet, Jesse Greener

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAttenuated total reflectionMicrofluidicsFabricationMaterials scienceInfraredOptoelectronicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OpticsChemistryNanotechnologyChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a generalizable method for the fabrication of disposable spectrofluidic devices for solution characterization by attenuated total reflectance (ATR) Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. A major design feature is the integration of an ATR element into the device rather than the fabrication of the microchannels on its sensing surface. This alleviates spatial limitations, due to small element footprint and dominance of edge-beading, enabling arbitrarily complex microfluidic circuitry and complex world-to-chip interfaces while leaving the entire ATR element available for sensing. An optimized optical interface maximizes light transfer into the on-chip sensing chamber. This promotes low limits of detection, fast measurements and/or designs featuring multiple sensing sub regions. To demonstrate the approach, we conducted measurements on complex flow profiles generated from four separate proof-of-concept spectrofluidic devices. A high sensitivity device detected glucose and sodium phosphate dibasic(Na2HPO4) at concentrations as low as 3 mM and 1 mM, respectively or and for time-lapse results with second-scale time resolution from single-scan measurements. We also demonstrated spatial selectivity for assays in parallel channels, measurements of concentration gradients in a multi-laminar co-flow device, and monitored fast kinetics of the protonation of a pH buffer in a microfluidic reactor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsFrench-language works237,207