<i>Prx1</i> + and <i>Hic1</i>+ Mesenchymal Progenitors Are Present Within the Epidural Fat and Dura Mater and Participate in Dural Injury Repair
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Epidural fat is commonly discarded during spine surgery to increase the operational field. However, mesenchymal progenitor cells (MPCs) have now been identified in human epidural fat and within the murine dura mater. This led us to believe that epidural fat may regulate homeostasis and regeneration in the vertebral microenvironment. Using two MPC lineage tracing reporter mice (Prx1 and Hic1), not only have we found that epidural fat MPCs become incorporated in the dura mater over the course of normal skeletal maturation, but have also identified these cells as an endogenous source of repair and regeneration post-dural injury. Moreover, our results reveal a partial overlap between Prx1+ and Hic1+ populations, indicating a potential hierarchical relationship between the two MPC populations. This study effectively challenges the notion of epidural fat as an expendable tissue and mandates further research into its biological function and relevance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".