Towards a COTS-Enabled Federated Cloud Architecture for Adaptive C2 in Coalition Tactical Operations: A Performance Analysis of Kubernetes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nowadays, ever-increasing processing and storage resources are available at all echelons, from operations centers to tactical units. However, tactical-edge communications still suffer from scarce network resources such as limited bandwidth, intermittent connectivity, and variable latency. In addition, modern military missions typically involve coalition operations, where heterogeneous mission partners (even belonging to different nations) cooperate in the field. As a result, the distribution of mission-critical information is more complicated than ever. On the one hand, the dynamic nature of the tactical environment frequently disrupts communications. On the other hand, individual resource-sharing policies prevent mission partners from taking full advantage of the available resources in situ. The NATO IST-168 RTG has been exploring commercial-off-the-shelf orchestration technologies for implementing a federated cloud architecture that enables adaptive information processing and dissemination while living within the constraints of the tactical domain. This paper is a follow-up study that assesses the behaviour of Kubernetes under the disadvantaged network conditions characterizing tactical edge networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".