MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205466533 · doi:10.18280/ts.380616

Early Detection of Hemorrhagic Stroke Using a Lightweight Deep Learning Neural Network Model

2021· article· en· W4205466533 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bandi Vamsi, Debnath Bhattacharyya, Divya Midhunchakkravarthy, Jungyoon Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaNational Research Foundation of KoreaNational Research Foundation
KeywordsSørensen–Dice coefficientRandom forestComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceStroke (engine)SegmentationConvolutional neural networkDeep learningArtificial neural networkConvolution (computer science)Pattern recognition (psychology)Image segmentationMachine learningEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In present days, the major disease affecting people all across the world is “Cerebrovascular Stroke”. Computed tomographic (CT) images play a crucial role in identifying hemorrhagic strokes. It also helps in understanding the impact of damage caused in the brain cells more accurately. The existing research work is implemented on the Graphical Processing Unit (GPU’s) for stroke segmentation using heavyweight convolutions that require more processing time for diagnosis and increases the model's cost. Deep learning techniques with VGG-16 architecture and Random Forest algorithm are implemented for detecting hemorrhagic stroke using brain CT images under segmentation. A two-step light-weighted convolution model is proposed by using the data collected from multiple- repositories to inscribe this constraint. In the first step, the input CT images are given to VGG-16 architecture and in step two, data frames are given to random forest for stroke segmentation with three levels of classes. In this paper, we explore various training time values in the detection of stroke that reduces when compared with existing heavyweight models. Experimental results have shown that when compared to other existing architectures, our hybrid model VGG-16 and random forest achieved increased results obtained are dice coefficient with 72.92 and accuracy with 97.81% which shows promising results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.423
Threshold uncertainty score0.624

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207