Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au cœur de la recherche depuis les débuts de l’archéologie préhistorique, le Sud-Ouest de la France a livré d’importantes séquences stratigraphiques qui permettent de discuter de l’évolution des associations fauniques tout au long du Paléolithique moyen. Les sites Paléolithiques de cette région, qui s’étend des Charentes aux Pyrénées en passant par le Périgord et le Quercy, ont joué un rôle-clé dans les débats sur les capacités d’exploitation de l’environnement par les Néandertaliens, notamment en ce qui a trait à la chasse aux grands herbivores (cheval, bison, etc.) et les mécanismes de compétition avec les carnivores. Ces dernières décennies, la reprise critiques des séquences, la multiplication d’études taphonomiques détaillées combinées à de nouvelles approches en archéozoologie ont permis de renouveler notre compréhension des comportements de subsistance en soulignant la diversité des stratégies développées par les sociétés néandertaliennes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".