MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205481811 · doi:10.1002/hsr2.478

Community‐based personal support workers' satisfaction with job‐related training at the organization in Ontario, Canada: Implications for future training

2022· article· en· W4205481811 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Science Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesSaint Mary's UniversitySt. Mary's UniversityMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJob satisfactionDescriptive statisticsThematic analysisWork (physics)Applied psychologyTraining (meteorology)PsychologyMental healthNursingMedical educationMedicineEngineeringSocial psychologyQualitative researchPsychiatryGeographySociologyMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Complexity of community-based homecare for older adults has increased significantly in the past decade in Ontario, Canada. Personal support workers (PSWs), who are unregulated and vary in formal education, provide the majority of community homecare work for increasingly complex clients. This paper seeks to understand community-based PSWs' satisfaction with opportunities for job-related training at their employing organization to provide the skills and knowledge to meet the demands of their evolving role. METHODS: Data for this paper are from a cross-sectional survey of 1746 community-based PSWs in Ontario, Canada entitled, "The PSW Health and Safety Matters Survey" www.pswshaveasay.ca. This survey was part of a research project "Keeping Community Based PSWs Safe in a Changing World of Work," funded by the Ontario Ministry of Labour. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlations, multivariate regression, and thematic analysis. RESULTS: Quantitative analysis revealed most community homecare organizations offer PSWs job-related training to help them retain and update their skills and that PSWs have a moderate level of satisfaction with their job-related training. The analysis revealed that PSWs' satisfaction with organizational training is greater when the organization provides work-related training on challenging tasks, lifting and transferring tasks, and tasks delegated by nurses and supervisors. Data from the open-ended question highlighted seven key themes for desired training by PSWs: safe body mechanics for moving/lifting clients, managing aggression primarily with clients, infection control, CPR/first aid, mental illness, equipment training, and basic health and safety. CONCLUSION: Implications for factors associated with PSWs' satisfaction with opportunities for job-related training are discussed along with recommendations for mitigating variability in education and training to meet the demands of their evolving role.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it