MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205489527 · doi:10.5194/epsc2021-605

Mutual radio occultation experiment between ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter and Mars Express: algorithms testing

2021· preprint· en· W4205489527 on OpenAlexaff
B. Nava, Yenca Migoya‐Orué, Anton Kashcheyev, Beatriz Sánchez‐Cano, Olivier Witasse, H. Svedhem, Jacob Parrott, Dimitri Titov, Andrea De Toni, C. O. Ao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersScience and Technology Facilities Council
KeywordsRadio occultationMars Exploration ProgramOrbiterIonosphereOccultationMartianSpacecraftAtmosphere of MarsAtmosphere (unit)Exploration of MarsPhysicsRadio ScienceDoppler effectGeodesyGeologyRemote sensingGeophysicsMeteorologyAstrobiologyAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radio Occultation (RO) is a very powerful technique to probe a planetary atmosphere, in providing vertical density profiles of the neutral atmosphere and ionosphere. The standard method uses a radio link between a spacecraft and an Earth ground station. Nevertheless, the possibility to obtain information about the Martian atmosphere with mutual RO events, using data from NASA Mars Odyssey and Mars Reconnaissance Orbiters (MRO), has been demonstrated by Ao et al. (2015).Taking advantage of two European spacecraft in orbit around Mars, the European Space Agency is currently preparing experiments of mutual RO between Mars Express (MEX) and the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter (TGO). In preparation of MEX and TGO data inversion and analysis, a simulation-based strategy has been adopted and an algorithm able to retrieve vertical electron density profiles from Doppler shift measurements has been implemented and validated. Subsequently, in order to test the mentioned algorithm with experimental data, the same three RO events considered in the paper by Ao et al. (2015) have been processed. In particular, for each RO event, having the information about the satellites’ orbit, the (excess) Doppler shift values corresponding to the Mars Odyssey-MRO ray-paths have been converted to bending angles as a function of impact parameter. Then, assuming a spherical symmetry (Fjeldbo et al., 1971) for the ionosphere electron density, the bending angles have been transformed (through Abel integral) to a vertical refractivity profile, which, in turn, has been converted to an ionospheric electron density profile.In this work, the results obtained by the application of the mentioned inversion algorithm to experimental data will be presented, with particular focus on the retrieval of the ionospheric electron density profiles.ReferencesAo, C. O., C. D. Edwards Jr., D. S. Kahan, X. Pi, S. W. Asmar, and A. J. Mannucci (2015), A first demonstration of Mars crosslink occultation measurements, Radio Sci., 50, 997–1007, doi:10.1002/2015RS005750.Fjeldbo, G., A. J. Kliore, and V. R. Eshleman (1971), The neutral atmosphere of Venus as studied with the Mariner V radio occultationexperiments, Astron. J., 76, 123–140.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207