Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a result of this review, it is possible to establish patterns of motor and sensory response, which, if satisfied, will ensure the safety and effectiveness of lesion production for our equipment and technique. The ideal response at 2 Hz should include contractions of the ipsilateral neck, especially the trapezius, at a threshold of 2–3 mA. The simultaneous appreciation of a contralateral sensory effect is a favourable sign. The ideal response pattern for stimulation at 100 Hz includes absence of muscle tetanization and a contralateral sensory hallucination (preferably of warmth) at a threshold below 1 mA. This hallucination should be located distal to the neck, preferably in the upper extremity. Lesion-making should be avoided: if tetanization occurs anywhere, if motor effects are seen distal to the upper extremity, in absence of contralateral sensory effects, or with prominent ipsilateral sensory effects. Caution should be used if motor threshold is less than 1 mA, especially if less than 0.5 mA; or if sensory threshold is greater than 2 mA, especially 3 mA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it