MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205504254 · doi:10.22215/etd/2021-14786

A Hybrid Learning Approach for Modelling and Analyzing Clickstream Data from Learning Management Systems

2021· dissertation· en· W4205504254 on OpenAlexaff
Alexis Amezaga Hechavarria

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOnline Learning and Analytics
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClickstreamComputer scienceHidden Markov modelMachine learningLearning analyticsNoveltyArtificial intelligenceAnomaly detectionTransformerOnline learningRecurrent neural networkClassifier (UML)Data miningArtificial neural networkEngineeringThe InternetMultimedia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this research, a hybrid approach combining a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) with a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network (RNN) is introduced to model realtime online feedback to students when completing academic activities using online Learning Management Systems (LMS).The solution provided is a Smart Classifier which unravels, and processes hidden patterns in the data to train appropriate metrics to raise flags indicating outlier student behavior based on historical data from previous and ongoing sessions.This work introduces an approach that facilitates modifications of the attention mechanism in Transformer models.Using this approach, the predictor module of the proposed solution is improved.The key element of this improvement is to use a Bayesian Graph Network (BGN) coupled to a Transformer.As a novelty, this method provides a systematic customization of the attention mechanism in Transformer models that can be applied to a range of problems involving clickstream data.Before anything else, I wish to express my deepest gratitude to my supervisor, Dr. M. Omair Shafiq for his unwavering support and belief in me.This thesis and the research behind it have been continuously guided by his enthusiasm, knowledge, research and teaching excellence in the field.From the early stages of my transition into the program and subsequent course work, to the completion of this thesis under the remote work and studying conditions imposed on us all by the pandemic, his remarkably constructive and effective feedback, insightful comments, and encouragement have been crucial for my success at every step of this journey.He has taught me very valuable lessons in a demanding field, always in the most professional, and yet warm and friendly, manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOnline Learning and AnalyticsFrench-language works237,207