MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4205505494 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2021.465

P.189 Unruptured Posterior Cerebral Artery aneurysm causing temporal lobe epilepsy

2021· article· en· W4205505494 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Gary Redekop, LS Yefet

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsVancouver Biotech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemporal lobePosterior cerebral arteryEpilepsyMedicineParahippocampal gyrusAneurysmInferior temporal gyrusRadiologyCardiologyMiddle cerebral arteryIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cerebral aneurysms are an unusal cause of epilepsy. To date, several groups have reported temporal lobe seizures caused by aneurysms projecting into the parahippocampal gyrus. Given the low incidence of posterior cerebral artery aneurysms, they are a very rare cause of temporal lobe seizures. Methods: Here, we report a rare case of temporal lobe epilepsy caused by an unruptured aneurysm. We also present a review of the literature yielding two similar cases. Results: A previosuly well 56 year old male presented to a neurologist with symptoms consistent with temporal lobe epilepsy. He was started on carbamzepine and underwent imaging and neuropsychological assessments. An MRI suggested the existance of a 7mm posterior cerebral artery aneurysm arising from the P2 segment of the posterior cerebral artery and projecting into the parahippocampal gyrus. This was also confirmed with CT angiography and the patient elected to have the aneurysm clipped. Conclusions: Temporal lobe epilepsy is an uncommon presentation for unruptured cerebral aneurysms. We report a rare case wherein a laterally pointing PCA aneurysm was buried in the posterior parahippocampal gyrus. This aneurysm had caused perifocal gliosis leading to stereotyped seizures. Post-operatively, the patient has been seizure free.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicEpilepsy research and treatment→French-language works237,207→