Jean-Louis Baudouin, Patrice Deslauriers (dir.), Droit à l’égalité et discrimination : Aspects nouveaux, Association Henri Capitant (section québécoise), Montréal, Yvon Blais, 2002, 330 pages, ISBN 2-89451-556-1 Pierre-Claude Lafond, Techniques de repérage des sources documentaires du droit, 2 édition, Cowansville, Yvon Blais, 2002, 410 pages, ISBN 2-89451-591-X Andrée Lajoie, Quand les minorités font la loi, Paris, P.U.F., 2002, 217 pages, ISBN 2-13-052330-7 Pierre Laporte, Hélène OuiMET, Code du travail du Québec, Législation, Jurisprudence, Doctrine, Montréal, Wilson & Lafleur, 14 édition, 2001, 852 pages, ISBN 2-89127-547-0 Ouvrage collectif, Le droit à l’égalité : les tribunaux d’arbitrage et le Tribunal des droits de la personne, Montréal, Themis, 2001, 273 pages, ISBN 2-89400-142-8 Jeffrey Talpis, If I am from Grand-Mère, Why Am I Being Sued in Texas?: Responding to Inappropriate Foreign Jurisdiction in Quebec-United States Crossboarder Litigation, Montréal, Thémis, 2001, 250 pages, ISBN 2-89400-139-8 Daniel Turp, Le droit de choisir : Essais sur le droit du Québec à disposer de lui-même, Montréal, Thémis, 2001, 996 pages, ISBN 2-89400-158-4 J.-P. VILLAGGI, L’évaluation psychologique dans le contexte légal : Sources et commentaires, Cowansville, Yvon Blais, 2001, 284 pages, ISBN 2-89451-498-0
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jean-Louis Baudouin, Patrice Deslauriers (dir.), Droit à l’égalité et discrimination : Aspects nouveaux, Association Henri Capitant (section québécoise), Montréal, Yvon Blais, 2002, 330 pages, ISBN 2-89451-556-1 / Pierre-Claude Lafond, Techniques de repérage des sources documentaires du droit, 2e édition, Cowansville, Yvon Blais, 2002, 410 pages, ISBN 2-89451-591-X / Andrée Lajoie, Quand les minorités font la loi, Paris, P.U.F., 2002, 217 pages, ISBN 2-13-052330-7 / Pierre Laporte, Hélène OuiMET, Code du travail du Québec, Législation, Jurisprudence, Doctrine, Montréal, Wilson & Lafleur, 14e édition, 2001, 852 pages, ISBN 2-89127-547-0 / Ouvrage collectif, Le droit à l’égalité : les tribunaux d’arbitrage et le Tribunal des droits de la personne, Montréal, Themis, 2001, 273 pages, ISBN 2-89400-142-8 / Jeffrey Talpis, If I am from Grand-Mère, Why Am I Being Sued in Texas?: Responding to Inappropriate Foreign Jurisdiction in Quebec-United States Crossboarder Litigation, Montréal, Thémis, 2001, 250 pages, ISBN 2-89400-139-8 / Daniel Turp, Le droit de choisir : Essais sur le droit du Québec à disposer de lui-même, Montréal, Thémis, 2001, 996 pages, ISBN 2-89400-158-4 / J.-P. VILLAGGI, L’évaluation psychologique dans le contexte légal : Sources et commentaires, Cowansville, Yvon Blais, 2001, 284 pages, ISBN 2-89451-498-0. Un article de la revue Revue générale de droit (Volume 33, numéro 1, 2003, p. 1-172) diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.054 | 0.029 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".