Application of physics-constrained data-driven reduced-order models to shape optimization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study proposes a novel approach for building surrogate models, in the form of reduced-order models(ROMs), for partial differential equation constrained optimization. A physics-constrained data-driven framework is developed to transform large-scale nonlinear optimization problems into ROM-constrained optimization problems. Unlike conventional methods, which suffer from instability of the forward sensitivity function, the proposed approach maps optimization problems to system dynamics optimization problems in Hilbert space to improve stability, reduce memory requirements, and lower computational cost. The utility of this approach is demonstrated for aerodynamic optimization of an NACA 0012 airfoil at $Re = 1000$ . A drag reduction of 9.35 % is obtained at an effective angle of attack of eight degrees, with negligible impact on lift. Similarly, a drag reduction of 20 % is obtained for fully separated flow at an angle of attack of $25^{\circ }$ . Results from these two optimization problems also reveal relationships between optimization in physical space and optimization of dynamical behaviours in Hilbert space.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it