MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4205517287 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v75i1.3251

Nocturnal Hypoglycemia Associated with Bedtime Administration of Premixed Insulin Preparations in Hospitalized Patients

2022· article· en· W4205517287 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Kelsey Mann, Heather Neville, John Robert Manderville

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Research
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Health AuthorityQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBedtimeMedicineHypoglycemiaNocturnalEmergency medicineIncidence (geometry)Diabetes mellitusPediatricsInsulinInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Patients with diabetes mellitus for whom premixed insulin preparations (PMIPs) are ordered in the hospital setting may be at risk of hypoglycemia if the PMIP is incorrectly administered at bedtime (instead of suppertime). Objectives: The primary objective was to determine, retrospectively, the incidence of bedtime administration of PMIPs at a tertiary teaching hospital. The secondary objective was to investigate whether bedtime administration of PMIPs led to an increase in nocturnal hypoglycemia. Methods: Inpatient PMIP orders for the period April 1, 2013, to March 31, 2017, were extracted from the pharmacy information system of the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia. Two hundred randomly selected inpatient admissions were audited, and instances of PMIP administration after 2000 (8 pm) were recorded. Data from an additional random sample of inpatient admissions, from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017, were reviewed to determine whether bedtime administration of PMIPs was associated with increased incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia, relative to suppertime administration. Results: In the randomly selected sample of 200 inpatient admissions, a PMIP was administered at bedtime at least once during 47 admissions (24%). In the additional sample of 123 inpatient admissions during which a PMIP had been administered, the mean nocturnal hypoglycemia rate was 4.15% for suppertime administration and 14.85% for bedtime administration (p = 0.13). Conclusions: For a substantial proportion of patients, PMIPs were inappropriately ordered and administered at bedtime in this hospital setting and may have been associated with nocturnal hypoglycemic events. Recommendations to reduce this practice include ongoing education and a review of preprinted order sets. RÉSUMÉ Contexte : Les patients atteints de diabète sucré pour lesquels des préparations d’insuline prémélangées (PIPM) sont commandées en milieu hospitalier peuvent présenter un risque d’hypoglycémie si elles sont administrées à tort au coucher (au lieu de l’heure du souper). Objectifs : L’objectif principal visait à déterminer, rétrospectivement, l’incidence de l’administration des PIPM au coucher dans un hôpital d’enseignement tertiaire. L’objectif secondaire visait quant à lui à déterminer si l’administration au coucher entraînait (ou non) une augmentation de l’hypoglycémie nocturne. Méthodes : Les données relatives aux commandes de PIPM pour les patients hospitalisés pendant la période du 1er avril 2013 au 31 mars 2017 ont été extraites du système d’information pharmaceutique du QEII Health Sciences Centre à Halifax (N.-É.). Deux cents admissions de patients hospitalisés sélectionnées au hasard ont été vérifiées et les cas d’administration des PIPM après 2000 (20 h) ont été enregistrés. Les données d’un échantillon aléatoire supplémentaire d’admissions de patients hospitalisés du 1er janvier 2016 au 31 décembre 2017 ont été examinées afin de déterminer si l’administration au coucher des PIPM était associée à une plus grande incidence d’hypoglycémie nocturne, par rapport à l’administration au souper. Résultats : Dans l’échantillon sélectionné au hasard de 200 admissions de patients hospitalisés, une PIPM a été administrée au coucher au moins une fois au cours de 47 admissions (24 %). Dans l’échantillon supplémentaire de 123 admissions de patients hospitalisés au cours desquelles une PIPM avait été administrée, le taux moyen d’hypoglycémie nocturne était de 4,15 % pour l’administration au souper et se montait à 14,85 % pour l’administration au coucher (p = 0,13). Conclusions : Pour une proportion considérable de patients, la PIPM a été prescrite de manière inappropriée et administrée au coucher dans ce milieu hospitalier et peut avoir été associée à des événements hypoglycémiques nocturnes. Les recommandations visant à réduire cette pratique comprennent une formation continue et un examen des ensembles de commandes préimprimés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy→Same topicDiabetes Management and Research→French-language works237,207→