MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205518397 · doi:10.1109/tsg.2021.3135791

A Novel DC Distance Relay for MVDC Microgrids

2021· article· en· W4205518397 on OpenAlexafffund
Mahmoud A. Allam, Khaled A. Saleh

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsGovernment of CanadaNatural Resources Canada
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsRelayBackupMicrogridFault (geology)Sensitivity (control systems)EngineeringInductorElectronic engineeringFault detection and isolationVoltagePower (physics)WaveformComputer scienceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Detecting faults in DC microgrids faces numerous challenges in terms of fast detection requirements, sensitivity against low- and high-resistance faults, and selectivity. This paper proposes a novel local-measurement-based DC distance relay for DC microgrids that addresses these challenges. The relay’s power circuit integrates an inductor at the end of each line. Additionally, it employs auxiliary components with a peak detection circuit (PDC) for capturing and processing different waveforms at the instant of fault occurrence. Local measurements of the relay voltages and currents are used to identify local forward faults, and to estimate the fault location within a short time frame. Furthermore, the relay provides backup protection for forward external faults on adjacent lines. The concept is first verified on a simple feeder. Then, a meshed DC microgrid, modeled in PSCAD/EMTDC environment, is used to further verify and evaluate the performance of the proposed scheme. Various fault scenarios are performed to examine the relay’s performance under different fault conditions. The results highlight the speed, selectivity, and sensitivity of the proposed method against bolted, low- and high-resistance faults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Smart GridSame topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207