MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205537205 · doi:10.20998/2079-0821.2021.01.14

THERMAL INTEGRATION OF COMPRESSION REFRIGERATION UNITS IN DAIRY FACILITIES

2021· article· en· W4205537205 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the National Technical University KhPI Series Chemistry Chemical Technology and Ecology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRanque-Hilsch vortex tube
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeat exchangerRefrigerationPinch analysisSubcoolingRefrigerantCooling capacitySTREAMSChillerEnvironmental scienceHeat recovery ventilationThermodynamicsHeat transfer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The heat integration of an ammonia compression refrigeration unit, that is used in different dairy facilities, was carried out by the pinch analysis methods. The schematic diagram of such unit with a cooling capacity of 1000 kW was taken as a basis. The main cycle temperatures, refrigerant consumption and its specific heat capacity were calculated for a given refrigerating capacity. Based on these data, a stream table was formed, that included a hot stream of a refrigerant – ammonia – and also two cold streams: water for chemical water treatment and water for technology. The hot stream of ammonia was divided into three streams: cooling of ammonia vapors, condensation and subcooling. Heat capacities flowrates and heat loads (stream enthalpy change) of the streams were determined. The minimum temperature difference in heat exchangers DTmin = 8°С was determined on the basis of technical and economic calculations for this process. The composite curves were plotted for the minimum temperature difference. The pinch temperatures were determined by the problem table algorithm for the hot and cold streams. The minimum values of hot and cold utilities load (QHmin and QСmin) were determined. The heat recovery capacity was determined, which was 701.8 kW. A grid diagram was built and heat exchangers are arranged in accordance with CP and N rules. The retrofit of process flowsheet is proposed on the basis of the grid diagram that includes the installation of three heat exchangers, one cooler and two heaters to achieve the target temperatures and flow rates. The use of Alfa Laval plate heat exchangers is proposed as heat exchange equipment. The payback period of the design is about two years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it