MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4205552647 · doi:10.1353/ohq.2017.0039

The Courtship of Eva Eldridge: A Story of Bigamy in the Marriage-Mad Fifties by Diane Simmons

2017· article· en· W4205552647 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sandy Polishuk

Bibliographic record

VenueOregon Historical Quarterly · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLaw, Rights, and Freedoms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWifeComedyMemoirJokePatienceEstateArt historyArtHistoryLawLiteratureSociologyTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

437 Reviews limitations discussed above, however, mean a missed opportunity for the author to engage fully with the broader scholarly debate and also limit the scope of the author’s own conclusions. Kimberly Jensen Western Oregon University THE COURTSHIP OF EVA ELDRIDGE: A STORY OF BIGAMY IN THE MARRIAGEMAD FIFTIES by Diane Simmons University of Iowa Press, Iowa City, 2016. Notes, bibliography, index. 272 pages. $19.95, paper. Bigamy. This word brings a smile to mind for many of us, perhaps we recall the 1950s comedy The Captain’s Paradise where Alex Guiness, the captain of the title, has a wife in each port on either end of his run. Perhaps it is a paradise for the bigamist, but to the unsuspecting victims it is no joke, rather a betrayal that can ruin lives. Diane Simmons did not choose to write about bigamy — it chose her when she was appointed executor for Eva Eldridge’s estate. As executor , Simmons was responsible for dealing with Eldrige’spossessionsandeventuallyfoundabox of 800 carefully bundled letters. As an awardwinning novelist, English professor, and reporter, Simmons was well qualified to take advantage of this windfall, although early on she resisted even reading them. It felt intrusive, but once she did she was hooked — they contained a story so remarkable and fascinating it transformed her into a detective. The book’s academic publisher lists the categories true crime and women’s studies on the back cover, but it might also have chosen sociology and psychology; Simmons found she needed to explore widely to make sense of the story she found. Eldridge’s mother, Grace, was a neighbor of Simmons’s in a rural eastern Oregon community . Eldridge, who was about twenty-five years older than Simmons, had left to work in wartime Portland before Simmons was born, but in the 1950s, Grace would often take her along when she visited her daughter who was living in Boise, Idaho. It was there that Simmons met Eldrige’s bigamist husband, although none of them then knew his secret at the time. Simmons only learned of it in the letters. While readers are aware of the bigamy from the book’s cover, Simmons does not address it in the first half of the book, which tells of Eldrige’s life in eastern Oregon as a teenager, her first courtship with a childhood beau who runs off to Canada to fight in World War II, her work in the Portland shipyards during World War II, and her courtship, marriage, and desertion with and by the handsome Vick in Boise. Readers share her puzzlement, if not her desperation when he disappears. Simmons reveals in Part 2 a letter from another wife that begins the detective story. Simmons cannot let it go and neither can the readers. How many wives were there? Why did Vick run off without a word, over and over again? Was he diagnosable? Why does Eva continue to love and long for her betrayer? Simmons hunts down Vick’s other wives and even their children, consults with psychiatrists, searches archives, and studies the letters in the box. This engaging read, entirely set in the Pacific Northwest, profiles an independent woman in an age that Simmons categorizes as marriagemad , who none-the-less manages to maintain her independence and survive despite betrayal. Readitasawarning,asapictureoftheNorthwest in an earlier time, or just for a good read. Sandy Polishuk Portland, Oregon WHITHER THE WATERS: MAPPING THE GREAT BASIN FROM BERNARDO DE MIERA TO JOHN C. FRÉMONT by John L. Kessell University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, 2017. Illustrations, maps, notes, bibliography, index. 120 pages. $29.95 paper. This attractive publication is effectively the illustrated companion to the author’s earlier biography of Miera and an interesting model ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0190.009
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOregon Historical QuarterlySame topicLaw, Rights, and FreedomsFrench-language works237,207