Algebraic Input-output Angle Equation Derivation Algorithm for the Six Distinct Angle Pairings in Arbitrary Planar 4R Linkages
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes a generalised algorithm that can be applied to any single degree of freedom parallel kinematic chain to determine the algebraic polynomial that represents the input-output equation relating any pair of distinct angles between any pair of links in the kinematic chain. There are six such algebraic polynomials for an arbitrary four-bar linkage. The algorithm consists of assigning standard Denavit- Hartenberg coordinate systems and parameters to the open kinematic chain. The open chain is conceptually closed by equating the forward kinematic transformation that maps coordinates of points in the “end-effector” coordinate system to the relatively non-moving base coordinate system to the identity matrix. The resulting transformation is mapped to Study soma coordinates wherein the twist and joint angles have been converted to tangent half-angle parameters. Elimination theory is then applied to the soma coordinates revealing a single algebraic polynomial in terms of the link lengths and the desired angle pair. Example applications are discussed for continuous approximate synthesis, mobility classification, and the design parameter space.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it